Jaringan Laboratorium Medis

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): May 2020
Original Articles

Profile of Incompatible Crossmatching Examination Results in Patients with Gel Test Method

PDF
  • Eni Ruwiyanti
Eni Ruwiyanti
UTD PMI Kabupaten Klaten

Published 2023-11-30

Keywords

  • Pretransfusion Testing,
  • Crossmatching Incompatible,
  • Gel Test

Copyright (c) 2020 Jaringan Laboratorium Medis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Profile of Incompatible Crossmatching Examination Results in Patients with Gel Test Method. (2023). Jaringan Laboratorium Medis, 2(1), 42-45. https://doi.org/10.31983/jlm.v2i1.6983

CrossMark



Dimensions

If it doesn't Appear, click here



PlumX Metrics



Impact Factor

or, Visit on here

Abstract

Laboratory examiners before giving blood transfusions (PretransfusionTesting) is a vital part of the transfusion activity. Incompatible Crossmatching blood tests on patients is consistent if we had to crossmatching one or more of the one or all of the positive so that blood is stated compatible with the patient. The gel test method has many advantages compared to the tubulating method other than the halting factor time. The gel test procedures have also been simpler, more practical, and easier results reading done. The goal of this study to identify the output of crossmatching receipts on the geltest method of 2019 in Indonesian Redcross of Klaten, this research method using a descriptive design with a sectional cross approach. And data retrieval using secondary data. The results shows the number of inconsistencies in patients of 116 cases. As many as 57% incompatible crossmatching major minor and autocontrol of 43% found a type of compatible major. The conclution are that in Indonesian Redcross of Klaten found most frequently in the diagnosis of anemia 59% patients.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Maharani, G.N. (2018). Immunohematology dan Bank darah, dalam : Bahan Ajar Teknologi Laboratorium Medik.Jakarta
  2. Dalimoenthe. (2014). Diskrepansi Golongan Darah ABO, Bandung, hal 54,58.
  3. Sindu,E. (2004). Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, dalam : Makalah Serologi Golongan Darah, Jakarta, hal. 17
  4. Permenkes. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomer 91 Tentang Standart Pelayanan darah Transfusi. Jakarta.
  5. Hartono, R., Soewono, S., & Ratnaningsih, T. (2019). Effects of Alcoholic Alcohol Administration on Mean Corpuscular Volume, Morphology of Blood Erythrocytes and Bone Marrow Normoblasts. Jaringan Laboratorium Medis, 1(1), 46-52.
  6. Sri Ratna Suminar. (2011). Analis Hukum Terhadap Pemberian Transfusi Darah di Rumah Sakit. FH UNISBA.
  7. PMI Kabupaten Klaten. (2019). Standar Operasional Prosedur Pemeriksaan Alur Permintaan Darah Transfusi. Klaten.
  8. Sudarwan, D. (2003). Riset Keperawatan Sejarah Metodologi. Penerbit Buku Kedokteran EGC : Jakarta.
  9. Purwanti, N. (2017). Transfusi Darah. Universitas Muhammadiyah : Semarang.
  10. Syafitri, R. (2016). Kasus-Kasus Rujukan Immunihematologi. UDD Pusat PMI
  11. Wahidiyat, PA. (2016). Transfusi Rasional pada Anak. Jakarta: Sari Pediatri.
  12. Wibawa, J. (2015). Uji Cocok Serasi (Crossmatch). PPT Handout.