Jaringan Laboratorium Medis

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): November 2023
Original Articles

Comparison Of Examination Results of Urine Protein With Dipstick, 6% Acetic Acid, and 20% Sulfosalisilic Acid Methods Using Westgard's Rule

PDF
  • Cecilia Febiyono Permata Sari,
  • Fitriani Kahar,
  • Irnawati,
  • Muh Yusuf,
  • Abdul Salam,
  • Abdul Wadood
Cecilia Febiyono Permata Sari
Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang
Fitriani Kahar
Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang
Irnawati
SMP Negeri 2 Parangloe Kabupaten Gowa
Muh Yusuf
SMP Negeri 15 Makassar
Abdul Salam
Department of Radiology Technology, College of Medical Technology Bacha Khan Medical College (BKMC) Mardan, Pakistan
Abdul Wadood
Clinical Technologist, Radiology Department, Hayatabad Medical Complex (HMC) Peshawar, Pakistan

Published 2023-12-11

Keywords

  • Accuracy,
  • Precision,
  • Urine protein

Copyright (c) 2023 Jaringan Laboratorium Medis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Comparison Of Examination Results of Urine Protein With Dipstick, 6% Acetic Acid, and 20% Sulfosalisilic Acid Methods Using Westgard’s Rule. (2023). Jaringan Laboratorium Medis, 5(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.31983/jlm.v5i2.9784

CrossMark



Dimensions

If it doesn't Appear, click here



PlumX Metrics



Impact Factor

or, Visit on here

Abstract

Proteinuria is caused by kidney damage. Qualitative examination of urine protein can be carried out using the dip strip method, 6% acetic acid and 20% sulfosalicylic acid. The aim of this research is to determine the accuracy and precision of urine protein examination using the dip strip method, 6% acetic acid and 20% sulfosalicylic acid. The research was experimental with repeated measurements of levels carried out visually and gave positive results of 1, 2, 3 and 4. The research was carried out in January 2022 using a research sample of 20 proteinuria positive patients at RSJD Dr. Amino Gondohutomo. The results of this research are that all methods meet the 12S rules where there is 1 control that is more than ± 2SD (still in the ± 3SD area), categorized as a warning/warning of method malfunction (needs more careful analysis). The best method is dip strip because it has the lowest Coefficient of Variation (KV) value, namely 0.497%. The method can still be used for patient care. The coefficient of variation obtained was dye liquid 0.497%, 6% acetic acid 0.654%, and 20% sulfosalicylic acid 0.630%. The smaller the KV value (%) the more thorough the system/method. The conclusion that can be drawn from this research is that the dip strip is a method that has the best accuracy and precision compared to the 6% acetic acid and 20% sulfosalicylic acid methods because it has the smallest coefficient of variation (KV%) value, namely 0.497% and meets the 12S rules. Researchers recommend always ensuring that the research location has the required samples with adequate volume, urine protein examination can be carried out using the dip strip method, researchers can then carry out urine protein examination regarding the sensitivity and specificity of the three qualitative methods.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Adawiyah, W. (2012). Uji Ketelitian dan Ketepatan Pemeriksaan Hemoglobin Pada Alat Buatan Superior Metode Sahli di Laboratorium Prodi D3 Analis Kesehatan Universitas Indonesia Timur. Universitas Indonesia Timur.
  2. Bandiyah, S., Santosa, B., & Ariyadi, T. (2017). Sensitivitas dan Spesifitas Protein Urine Metode Carik Celup dan Asam Acetat 6% pada Ibu Hamil. Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang.
  3. Cooper, G. (2008). Basic Lessons in Laboratory Quality Control - QC Workbook. Bio-Rad Laboratories, 62.
  4. De Silva, D. A., Halstead, A. C., Côté, A. M., Sabr, Y., von Dadelszen, P., & Magee, L. A. (2014). Urinary Dipstick Proteinuria Testing: Does Automated Strip Analysis Offer an Advantage Over Visual Testing? Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 36(7), 605–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30540-5
  5. Gandasoebrata, R. (2016). Penuntun Laboratorium Klinik (16th ed.). Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.
  6. Kahar, F. (2015). Perbandingan Hasil Pemeriksaan Protein Urine Dengan Menggunakan Asam Asetat 6% Dengan Asam Cuka Komersial 6%. Jurnal Kesehatan Bung, 5(2), 189–384.
  7. Kahar, F., Purlinda, D. E., & Setyowatiningsih, L. (2022). Profil Diabetes Mellitus Pada Penderita Tuberculosis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional UNIMUS, 5, 1086–1095.
  8. Kurniawan, B. (2016). Perbedaan Hasil Pemeriksaan Protein Urin Metode Carik Celup, Metode Asam Asetat 6% dan Metode Asam Sulfosalisilat 20%. Politeknik Kesehatan Palembang.
  9. Kusuma, N. R. (2020). Sistem Ekskresi. Makassar: Direktorat SMA, Direktorat Jenderal PAUD, DIKDAS dan DIKMEN.
  10. Mardiana, & Rahayu, I. G. (2017). Pengantar Laboratorium Medik (1st ed.). Pusat Pendidikan Sumber Daya Manusia Kesehatan.
  11. Nurhayana, & Sugihantono, A. (2021). Kadar Kadmium ( Cd ) dalam Urine pada Perokok Pasif. 03(02), 96–103.
  12. Pearce, E. C. (2011). Anatomi dan Fisiologis untuk Paramedis (35th ed.). Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  13. Putri, R. R. U. (2019). Evaluasi Pemantapan Mutu Internalterhadap Hasil Nilai Kritis di Laboratorium RS PKU Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
  14. Qomariyah, N., Kahar, F., & Devinavita, A. (2022). Hubungan Kadar Glukosa Darah Dan Tekanan Darah Pada Komunitas Lansia Rw. Ix Kelurahan Sendangmulyo Kecamatan Tembalang Kota Semarang. Nursing Update: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Keperawatan, 13(2), 1–12.
  15. Qomariyah, N., Kahar, F., & Meyriska Frisna Putri. (2022). Hubungan Kadar Kolesterol Dan Tekanan Darah Pada Komunitas Lansia Rw Ix Kelurahan Sendangmulyo Kecamatan Tembalang Kota Semarang. Jurnal Analis Kesehatan Klinikal Sains, 10(2), 163–174.
  16. Riyanto. (2014). Validasi & Verifikasi Metode Uji Sesuai dengan ISO/IEC 17025 Laboratorium Pengujian dan Kalibrasi (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
  17. Sari, L. P. (2020). Gambaran Kadar Pb ( TIMBAL ) dalam Urine pada Pekerja Peleburan Logam di Perkampungan Industri Kecil ( PIK ). Jaringan Laboratorium Medis, 02(02), 97–103.
  18. Sari, M. R. (2020). Profil Kadar Kadmium ( Cd ) Dalam Urine pada Perokok Aktif. Junal Laboratorium Medis, 02(01), 37–41.
  19. Siregar, M. T., Wulan, W. S., Setiawan, S., & Nuryati, A. (2018). Kendali Mutu.
  20. Stefańska, K., Zieliński, M., Zamkowska, D., Adamski, P., Jassem-Bobowicz, J., Piekarska, K. Marek-Trzonkowska, N. (2020). Comparisons of dipstick test, urine protein-to-creatine ratio, and total protein measurement for the diagnosis of preeclampsia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124195
  21. Syahrum, & Salim. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif (R. Ananda, Ed.). Citapustaka Media.
  22. Westgard, J. (2019). “Westgard Rules” and Multirules.
  23. Widyastuti, R., Tunjung, E., & Purwaningsih, N. V. (2018). Modul praktikum urinalisis dan cairan tubuh. 32–33.